Testing the activity
Preliminary tests
Single big trapdoor design Faster double door Sensor assembly
(too slow)
Dropper design v2
Having a single motor handle Dropper v2 (good for bricks, Dropper v2 (empty)
both doors (too weak) too small for light objects)
Dropper v2 (open)
Dropper v2 (closed)
Building the tower
Adapting standard LEGO Back of the tower Front of the tower, with
blocks to the LEGO Technic assembled Mindstorms parts
system
Finished tower
...with insert for dropping ...with loaded "heavy object" ...with empty platform ...with loaded "light object"
LEGO bricks (Post-it note)
Mindstorms code used in the successful tests
Final test
Dropping something heavy Dropping something light
Evaluation
Difficulties
Difficulties that arose during our testing of the activity were firstly the length of the cables. Having them in only one fixed size, expensive to reorder for potential hardware hacking and fairly short really limits machines that try to have a bigger size.
We used a second sensor from another kit, so it wouldn’t even be possible make it with one Lego kit.
Using one sensor was very inaccurate and couldn’t deliver results that were good enough to work with further.
The plastic piece bouncing out of the sensor area was solved by using the instruction manual as a dampening device, therefore still only using original Lego components.
The AI image generation posed difficulties with creating consistent character design, and had problems creating moving images, prompting us to use Canva and stock footage as opposed to AI content.
Limitations
LEGO Mindstorms might not accessible to every class due to its pricey nature, one set being 434,- via betzold.at at this moment. Thinking about doing it with an entire class would probably multiply the cost by 4 or 5 to still not have a too big group size. Therefore, it could be necessary to do an excursion if the kits are not a feasible option to one’s
particular school. This is also why the activity is designed around a visit to the CE-LAB, and even then it is infeasible to let a whole class participate - dividing a whole class onto 4 Mindstorms kits would lead to impractical group sizes.
The excursion offers new information to the students whilst being very incompatible with an ordinary timetable, still leaving it as a possibility for a specialty workshop at the end of the year or similar, but still limiting if the school isn’t implementing a system like that.
Potential uses for the future
This activity can set a first contact with „out of school“ makerspaces and therefore offers a new set of tools, often unobtainable by a lot of educational facilities.
It can be implemented as one „end of the school year“ intensive course, creating a visible connection point for the arts & crafts and physics teachers to cooperate. Having it in an external space could also make students see their potential interest in working in the research field due to the investigative Nature and the appearance of the CE-Lab.
By having an eye on the female students‘ interactions with the material it could be a possible groundwork to empower future women in stem and set the stage for gender balance in this sector.