In this tutorial we will
To this end we will use the software CYANA, NMR2, and excel (or similar)
Content
|
Please follow the following steps carefully (exact Linux commands are given below; you may copy them to a terminal):
cd "download path"/cyana-3.98.15
#optional
sudo xattr -rd com.apple.quarantine cyanaexe.macarm-gfortran
./cyana
CYANA 3.98.15 (macarm-gfortran)
Copyright (c) 2002-22 Peter Guentert. All rights reserved.
___________________________________________________________________
Demo license valid for specific sequences until 2024-12-31.
Library file "/Users/julienorts/Downloads/cyana-3.98.15/lib/cyana.lib" read, 41 residue types.
To be able to execute cyana in any directory, one options is to create an alias. For that,
Hint: More information on the CYANA commands etc. is in the CYANA 3.0 Reference Manual.
Remark: CYANA is a proprietary software. For any installation problem, contact Peter Güntert, the author of CYANA.
You need also a molecular viewer capable of saving mol2 file
Download the zip file for the workshop: workshopData.zip
Open the simulation_data.xlsx in part1/task1_to_3 directory. These are for us the experimetal data! We will start with the structure calculation of our ligand (drug-like) molecule. From the NOESY spectra, we obtain the cross-relaxation rates using the intensity (volume) of the crosspeaks at a known (experimentally set) mixing time.These are directly related to the interatomic distances, which will determine the conformation of the molecule.
The NOESY spectrum contain also diagonal crosspeaks. These correspond to the (non-equilibrium Z-) magnetisation decay of the spin-themselfs: autorelaxation.
Rii = ρi = b2/dij6 (J(0) + 3J(ω) + 6J(2ω)) #contribution of one neighbor spin "j" in distance "d".
And the crossrelaxation rate between H-spins "i" and "j" is:
Rij = σij = b2/dij6 (-J(0) + 6J(2ω)),
where "b" is the dipol-dipol interaction strength, and "J(ω)" is the spectral density at angular frequency "ω". The spectral density J is the Fourier transformation of the rotational correlation function, shows the distribution of frequencies of the molecular rotational motion.
The initial rate of the NOESY crosspeak, is directly proportional to 1/distance6 between the respective spins (protons). The other dependency comes from the rotational correlation time of the molecule, which is dependent on temperature, solvent viscosity, solvation shell of the molecule, shape of the molecule, and in the case of a small molecule partly bound to a larger protein, the effective correlation time is also modulated by this partial bounding - the chemical exchange. Therefore, it is practical to leave these dependencies aside, and calibrate the relation between the NOE buildup rate (cross-relaxation rate) and the interproton distance using a known distance. Fortunately, there are many proton pairs in the molecule with fixed distance, simply due to the covalent structure.
For the reference pair of protons. We have now also the reference sigma σRef.
Use the formula
rij = rRef * (σRef/σij)^(1/6). [Eq. 1] Vogeli 2014, Eq. 63b
to calculate the other distances between other atoms (in a separate column).
There is no closed-form formula to calculate the conformation (structure) from a set of distances. The setup starts with defining an energy penalty for every experimental distance not fulfilled by the molecular conformation. These are also called distance restraints. Starting from one chosen conformation, and trying to minimize the structure (using steepest descent or other local method) to fulfill the distances measured by NOE (or any other means) would fail: the structure would end-up in a local minimum. Instead we have to search for a global minimum. A commonly used algorithm for a global minimum is called simulated annealing, where the molecule is heated up such that high energy barriers (due to van-der Waals clashes) can be surpassed. By a subsequent cooling, the imposed distance restraints will drive the molecule towards the conformation with minimal violation of the distance restraints. Many attempts will nevertheless end up in different local minima, and hence, only a subset of resulting conformers, the lowest-energy conformers will be likely to represent the global minimum.
In practice, we have to input the knowledge about the covalent (bonding) structure of the molecule, and the distance restraints. The bonding structure can be as simple as the chain of aminoacids, as the standard programs would have libraries of the actual atomic bonding (topology) for those. For an unknown molecule, we have to supply a full topology ourselves. These would be different for different programs.
We will use program specialized structure calculation from NMR restraints: CYANA by Prof. Dr. Peter Günter.
CYANA can obtain the bonding topology from a .mol2 molecular structure file, converting it into its own (library) format, a .lib file. This library file with contain information about one molecule, but since biopolymers - proteins contain chain (sequence) of building blocks like aminoacid residues of nucleotides, there has to be also information about the sequence of those building block. In our case it contains only one record: the name of our ligand molecule.
We will use a ready mol.lib file in our exercise. Besides of the physical atoms H, there are also pseudoatoms Q created to replace the chemically equivalent H atoms. We complete the information by a .seq file with a "sequence" containing only one line the name and number of the residue (MOL 999).
The other information: the distance restraints are obtained by CYANA from a separate text file, where the pairs of atoms are identified by three and three columns, and the distance in Ånsgrom.
ResidueNumber1 residueName1 atomName1 residueNumber2 residueName2 atomName2 distance.
In our first calculation of a single molecule (residue), obviously only the atomName1 and atomNam2 would be different. Further instructions for CYANA are read from the .cya file.
Note that the atom numbers and names have to exactly match the MOL.lib file.
Note also, that the distance has to be in a numerical format using "dot" as a decimal separator and not a "comma"!
In a little while, the calculation is ready.
We have now the structure file: demo.pdb
and the overview file about the calculation: demo.ovw
From the theoretical introduction about NOE, we know that the existence of crosspeak between two spins does not have to be caused by the direct through-space transfer of magnetisation between them. Instead, magnetisation transfer via a third nucleus can occur. This is called spin diffusion.
Compare the structures, check the .ovw file.
Instead of the first mixing time in Task 1,
choose the last mixing time and proceed all the way to calculate the structure in CYANA.
Note the differences in extracted distances and in the resulting structures.
In this short exercise, we will calculate the protein structure using ready distances stored in the final_protein.upl file. We do not need any extra library file, as this time, the sequence file (demoShort.seq) contains only standard
aminoacid residues.
Look at the structures using chimera molecular viewer.
cat final_protein.upl mol.upl intermolecular.upl > complex.upl
Note! if using VMD as a molecular viewer, it will refuse to recognize large parts of the secondary structure! Or in other words, the resulting protein-ligand structure has the secondary structure further away from the standard definition.
The calibration of the distances from the measured NOE intensities, using a known, fixed distance, can be inaccurate for several reasons. In this exercise, we correct for some of them in two steps. Firts, the NOE intensities will be normalized using the diagonal intensities (their geometric mean) corresponding to the NOE crosspeak. This corrects for
The step above makes the crossrelaxation rates σi,j in correct mutual proportion. The actual values can be still inaccurate due to inaccurate reference distance, rRef in Eq. 1, or rather σRef being not correctly proportional to the rRef due to spin diffusion or other effects. It is therefore recommendable to correct the median of the measured distances such that it corresponds to the distances conserved among these organic molecules: around 4.2 Å for intramolecular distances and 4.4 Å for the intermolecular distances. When correcting the derived distances, we include a constant to multiply the distances in order to obtain the desired median.
NMR2 runs via the platform SAMSON.