Versionen im Vergleich

Alte Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Ruth Siebenaller

Gespeichert am

verglichen mit

Neue Version Aktuell

changes.mady.by.user Boczy Tatjana

Gespeichert am

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

The project "Najemniški SOS" (Tenant SOS) Tenants SOS aims to address the challenges faced by tenants in Slovenia. It recognizes the difficulties tenants encounter in the rental market, such as high costs, inadequate housing, and limited awareness of tenant rights. The project provides a comprehensive platform offering solutions to common rental issues and questions, compiled with the help of experts. Additionally, it advocates for systemic changes in the housing sector, emphasizing the need for a new housing system that prioritizes providing suitable homes over profit-making. The project serves as a support system for tenants, empowering them with information, resources, and advocacy for a fairer and more equitable rental environment.  please proofread!

Image Modified

©tbc



https://najemniski-sos.si/

https://www.facebook.com/NajemniskiSOS

Involved Actors & Resources

Governmental body:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the governmental body
Other public actors:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the public actors and describe which sector and explain their role, briefly
Private for-profit actors:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain by using types of private for-profit actors such as public engagement consultants, companies etc.
Private not-for-profit actors:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain by using types of private not-for-profit actors such as associations, informal networks etc.
Civic actors:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes, explain on the heterogeneity of the participants with respect to gender, age, educational qualification, place of residence etc
.
Institute for Housing and Spatial Studies, Today is a new day association. 
Other actors: Yes / NoIf yes, explain
Funding/Financial resources for the particular best practice example: Active citizens fund Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway
If yes, specify e.g. amount of funding/year /
and the source(s) of funding (if more sources, please specify)


Type of Governance

Participatory process: Yes / NoYes
Deliberative
process: Yes / NoYesOther forms: if yes, specify;Top-downNoBottom-upYesOthers: if yes, specify;
, bottom-up participatory process


Specific Features on the

Specifal Features of the Best Practice which explain

Practical Arrangements to Promote Inclusiveness

Cost reimbursement (e.g., for public transport, compensation of working hours):
if yes, describe
 No
Provision of care services:
if yes, describe
No
Provision of mediators (e.g., linguistic, cultural):
if yes, describe/specify
 No
Frequency of activities within the best practice: How often and for how long did participants involve in best practice (e.g., in general friendly towards employed people or people with care responsibilities)?2023: From 14 days to
menthly
monthly. Depends on activities. 


Target

groups

Groups

= Tennents Yes / NoIf yes: / NoPeople posibilities accomodation Yes / NoIf yes: tennetsIf yes: Yes / NoYoung If yes:
External inclusion referring to who is invited or allowed to take part from the invitation
(in an ideal situation)
Tenants in Ljubljana
Internal inclusion referring to the participation of all participants within = real situation Internal exclusion referring to certain participants who are overly dominant 
Vulnerable groups were specified in the designed plan of the best practice:
No
If yes: Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify.
Special attention towards young people, women, elderly people:Yes
If yes, specify.
, people with limited
possibilities to find affordable
accommodation in Ljubljana
Did vulnerable groups participate in the best practice:
Yes
, migrants, young professionals, tenants.
Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify.Migrants, young professionals,
tenants
Participation of young people, women, elderly people:
Yes
If yes, specify.
, young people, women, migrants
Did special training and empowerment activities support these groups within the participatory process?No


Public Information

Activities on the Best Practice

Activities 

Means of Information

Provided

provided: Multiple

Information documents (e.g., flyer, brochures, invitation letters):
yes/no;
Yes
If yes: multiple
Multiple languages available:
Yes / No
No
If yes: non
Non-technical language used:
Yes / No
Yes
Social Media
(e.g., facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, websites, blog)
:
Yes / No
YesIf yes: Please specify
Facebook, Instagram
Others (1-2 sentences)Way of Communication


Ways of Communication 

Website and social media postings:
Yes / No
Yes
Information documents distributed in the post box:
yes/no
Yes
Information documents distributed on streets and public spaces (during events):
Yes / No
Yes
Press releases in “traditional” public media (e.g. linear TV, daily newspapers etc.):
Yes / No
No
Special-target activities (e.g. through gate-openers, community workers etc.):
Yes / No
Yes


Monitoring

Monitoring process on the best practice available?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes: Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to the participants:
Yes / NoIf yes: How? How often?Yearly
Yes
, yearly.
Integration of participants in the monitoring process?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Did they have the opportunity to suggest changes to the process?
Yes / No
Yes
Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to network partners (public and non-public actors)?Yes
If yes:
How? How often?Once every 6 months


Impact Assessment and/or Evaluation

Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place:
Yes / NoYesIf yes: Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process?
Yes, Internal evaluation.
Internal evaluation


Citizen Empowerment & Representation

Structured Decision-Making

Monitoring

Explanation of objectives and methods, at the beginning of the process?
Yes / NoIf yes:
Yes
Do the participants make final decisions?Yes
If no: Why? Who decides instead?
What kinds of decisions?Selected ones. 
If yes:
Is there a veto right by the citizens (i.e. if they are against a specific option this is not implemented
?
)?
Yes / No
Its an assembly. No veto.
At the end of the participation process: Final document on the decisions that were taken?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Is there a publication of this document available?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Is the publication of this document sent to participants and/or affected community?
Yes / No
Yes


Tools to Enhance Citizens’ Empowerment

Clear definition and communication of mutual commitments, decision-making roles and any limits on the decisions?
Yes / No
Yes
Are specific tools available to participants (e.g., regular meetings or
trainings
training, apps)?Yes
If yes: What kind of?Meetings, asembleysIf not: Why not?
, Meetings, assemblies.


Integration of empowerment tools in multi-level-governance-system

?Yes

If yes: Where [in
Where are these tools available? [In the sense of at which level in the multilevel-governance (vertical).]
?
Local  level
If yes:
For whom in particular (horizontal)?
TennetsIf not: Why not? What results from that (e.g., disconnection etc.)
Tenants


Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups

Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups
Horizontal non-hierarhical

Which groups are involved at which stage of the participatory process?Architects, urbanists,
tennents
tenants (Horizontal non-hierarchically)
What are the tasks of the groups? Describe for each group.Planning, researching, informing,
lobbiing
lobbying, 
Which groups are underrepresented among the participants? Why?