Versionen im Vergleich

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

At Zentrum Überleben Centre for Survival, survivors of violence, trauma, and displacement, along with individuals with diverse migration experiences, receive comprehensive support encompassing medical, psychotherapeuticpsycho-therapeutic, social work, and integrative assistance. Beyond rehabilitation and integration, the center's focus on scientific research and documentation contributes to broader insights in into the field of trauma, therapy, and the establishment of scientific standards.

The center provides avenues for medical diagnostics and treatment within a holistic psychosomatic framework. In the Refugee Assistance Department, refugees and migrants access a wide range of services, from psychological, legal, and social counseling counselling to vocational training, facilitating their transition into education and employment.

The scientific division for trauma and transculturality at Zentrum ÜBERLEBEN trans-culturality at the Center for Survival conducts research aiming to scientifically investigate the psychological impact of war and torture. Additionally, the center houses a specialized library gathering literature and resources on the specific effects of torture, persecution, and extreme trauma. please proofread! 

©tbc


www.ueberleben.org

Involved Actors & Resources

Governmental body:
Yes /
No
noIf yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the governmental body
Other public actors:
Yes /
No
no
If yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the public actors and describe which sector and explain their role, briefly:
Private for-profit actors:
Yes / NonoIf yes, explain by using types of private for-profit actors such as
public engagement consultants, companies etc.
No
Private not-for profit actors:
Yes / No
No
noIf yes, explain by using types of private not-for-profit actors such as associations, informal networks etc.
Civic actors:
Yes / NonoOther actors: Yes /
If yes, explain on the heterogeneity of the participants with respect to gender, age, educational qualification, place of residence etc.
No
If yes, explain
Funding/financial resources for the particular best practice example
donation
Donation from public and private sources; health insurance system for individual therapies
If yes, specify
Specification e.g. amount of funding/year
n.a.
N/A ; overall turn over 8.
35million
35 Mio Euro in 2019
(before Covid)and the source
Source(s)
of funding (if more sources, please specify)
:

Public

from public

sources ca. 70%: Berlin

govmt.

city government, FRG, EU-AMIF, in addition to private foundations.


Type of Governance

Participatory process: Yes / NonoDeliberative process: Yes / NonoOther forms: if yes, specifyTop-downno
Bottom-up
yesOthers: if yes, specify
process


Specific Features on the

Specifal Features of the Best Practice which explain

Practical Arrangements to Promote Inclusiveness

Cost reimbursement (e.g., for public transport, compensation of working hours)
: if yes, describe
does
Does not apply

Provision of

care services: If yes, describeProvision of

mediators (e.g., linguistic, cultural):

If yes, describe / specify
No
Frequency of activities within the best practice:
How often and for how long did participants
invovle
involve in best practice (e.g., in general friendly towards employed people or people with care responsibilities)? Does not apply


Target

groups

Groups

External inclusion referring to who is invited or allowed to take part from the invitation
=
(in an ideal situation)
does
Does not apply
Internal inclusion referring to the participation of all participants within
=
, i.e. the real situation
does
Does not apply
Internal inclusion referring to certain participants who are overly dominant
Vulnerable groups were specified in the designated plan of the best practice:Yes
/ Noyes
If yes:
Who in particular, e.g., migrants, people in precarious work-situation, etc.? Specify.
traumatised
Traumatized refugees
If yes:
Special attention towards young people, women, elderly people:Yes
/ NoyesIf yes
,
specify. If yes: Who in particular, e.g., migrants, people in precarious work-situation, etc.? Specify.traumatised refugeesIf yes:
many young male refugees in the age of around 20 yrs., victims of sexual abuse including trafficking
Did vulnerable groups participate in the best practice:
Yes / Noyes
Yes, traumatized refugees
Special attention towards young people, women, elderly people:
Yes / No
does
Does not apply
If yes, specify. If yes: Did special training and empowerment activities support these groups within the participatory process? 


Public Information

Activities on the Best Practice

Activities 

Means of Information

Providedwebsite

provided: Website, press releases

Information documents (e.g., flyer, brochures, invitation letters):

Yes / No

Information brochure on emotional problems and how to cope with them, available as download
If yes: multiple langugages
Multiple languages available:Yes
/ Noyes
, Arabic, Farsi and English
If yes: non
Non-technical language used:
yes/no
yes
Yes
Social
media (e.g., Facebook, Instragram, WhatsApp, websites, blog): yes/no
Media:Facebook
yesIf yes: please specify facebook
, Instagram, WhatsApp,
websiteOthers (1-2 sentences) Way of Communicationn.a.
Website


Ways of Communication 

Website and social media postings:
Yes / No
 facebook
 Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp,
website
Website
Information documents distributed in the post box:Yes
/ Noyes
Information documents distributed on streets and
pulic
public spaces (during events):
Yes
N/
No
A
n.a.
Press releases in "traditional" public media (e.g., linear TV, daily newspapers etc.):Yes
/ No
yes
Special-target activities (e.g., through gate-openers,
communiy
community workers etc.):Yes
/ Noyes
, for attracting private donors and general publicity for the center's causes


Monitoring

Monitoring process on the best practice available:Yes
/ NoyesIf yes: Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to the participants:
Yes / NonoIf yes: How? How often? 
No
Integration of participants in the monitoring
proces
process:
Yes / No
noIf yes: Did they have the opportunity to suggest changes to the process: Yes /
No
Continuous information on monitoring results provided to network partners (public and non-public actors):Yes
/ Noyes
Impact Assessment/Evaluation
n.a.
N/A


Impact Assessment and/or Evaluation

Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place:Yes
/ NoyesIf yes: who evalueates
Who evaluates? What? How? A which point of process? The
centre
center has an academic department primarily for accompanying diagnostics. Therapies are evaluated by questionnaires.


Citizen Empowerment & Representation

Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place: yes/noDid an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place: yes/noIf yes: Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process?If yes: Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process?Citizen Empowerment & RepresentationCitizen Empowerment & Representation
Structured Decision-Making

Structured Decision-Making

Explanation of objectives and methods, at the beginning of the process: Yes / No
Do the participatns participants make final decisions? 
If no: Why? Who decides instead? 
If yes: What kind of decisions? 
If yes: Is there a veto right by citizens (i.e., if they are against a specific option this is not implemented?): Yes / No
At the end of the participation process: Final document on the decision that were taken? Yes/no
If yes: publication of this document available? Yes / No
If yes: publication of this document sent to participants and/or affected community? Yes / No


Tools to Enhance

Citizens' Empowerment 

Citizens’ Empowerment

Yes / No trainings Yes / Nogovernancy (in ?
Clear definition and communication of mutual commitments, decision-making and roles and any limits on the decisions:
Are specific tools available to participants (e.g., regular meetings or training, apps):
If yes: What kind of? 
If not: Why not? 
Integration of empowerment tools in multi-level-governance system?
If yes: Where are these tools available? [In the sense of at which level in the multilevel-governance (vertical).] 
If yes: For whom in particular (horizontal)? 


Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups

Which groups are involved in which stage of the participatory process
What are tasks of the groups? Describe for each group
Which groups are underrepresented among the participants? Why?