Versionen im Vergleich

Alte Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Ruth Siebenaller

Gespeichert am

verglichen mit

Neue Version Aktuell

changes.mady.by.user Boczy Tatjana

Gespeichert am

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

The Regional Integration Network Berlin (RIN Berlin) is dedicated to enhancing sustainable employment opportunities for individuals with migration backgrounds in Berlin. Coordinated by the Senate Department for Labor, Social Affairs, and Integration, RIN Berlin orchestrates seven specialized qualification projects. These projects cater to migrants aspiring to work in areas such as administration, healthcare, environmental conservation, digitization, and vocational training programs offered by the Chamber of Crafts (HWK) or the Chamber of Industry and Commerce (IHK). 

Moreover, RIN Berlin offers tailored support for professionally qualified women seeking entry into the workforce through a mentoring program. Complementing these initiatives, RIN Berlin provides comprehensive guidance to employers, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises and institutions, focusing on talent acquisition and retention strategies. This support encompasses various aspects, including assistance with recognition procedures, navigating the Skilled Immigration Act, and harnessing the potential of social media for effective workforce development.

One noteworthy initiative within RIN Berlin is the Consortium for Educationally Adequate Employment. This platform, led by the Senate Department, collaboratively addresses and dismantles barriers that migrants face in accessing educationally suitable opportunities in specific industries, fostering solutions within a collaborative framework.


Facebook | LinkedIn

Image Added©  

https://www.berlin.de/lb/intmig/themen/ausbildung-und-arbeit/iq-landesnetzwerk-berlin/


Involved Actors & Resources

Governmental body:
Yes / No
 Yes.
RIN Berlin, coordinated by the Dept. of Integration, Labour / Social
If yes, explain by filling in the name
Name(s) of the governmental bodyServices. Financial partners are: Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs,
Other public actors:
Yes / No
European Social Fund (ESF), Dept. of Integration, Labour/Social Affairs Berlin
If yes, explain by filling in the name
Name(s) of the public actors and describe which sector and explain their role, briefly:Employers seeking
labour
employees.
Private for-profit actors:
Yes / No
Indirectly. These are firms and institutions seeking
labour
employees.
If yes, explain by using types of private for-profit actors such as
public engagement consultants, companies etc.
What types of organisations?Public administration, care takers, hospitals, and private businesses.
Private not-for profit actors:
Yes / No
8
Eight exemplary training projects and
4
four supporting projects
If yes, explain by using types of private not-for-profit actors such as associations, informal networks etc.
What types of organisations?Training projects experienced in the field of environmental
Civic actors:
Yes / No
Renewable energy,
digitalisation
Digitalisation. Mentoring courses.
If yes, explain on the heterogeneity
Heterogeneity of the participants with respect to gender, age, educational qualification, place of residence
etc.
, or otherParticipants originate from diverse migrant
mcultures
cultures, sexes and age groups.
Other actors:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain
Funding/financial resources for the particular best practice exampleBudget of 8,4 million EUR for 3 years (2023-2025) -50% Federal
If yes, specify e.g. amount
Specification of funding/
year
financial resourcesServices. Financial partners are: Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs


Type of Governance

Participatory process:
Yes / No
Yes, insofar as diverse migrant organisations and specific training
orgs.
organisations for women are partners.
Deliberative process:
Yes / No
No
Other forms: if yes, specifyNo
Top-downThe initiator has been the Regional Integration Network with mixed membership.
Bottom-upInsofar that there is Mixed membership in RIN (Migrant and
womens
women training
orgs.
organisations as well)
Others: if yes, specify


Specifal Features of the Best Practice which explain

Specific Features on the Practical Arrangements to Promote Inclusiveness

Cost reimbursement (e.g., for public transport, compensation of working hours):
if yes, describe
 N/A
Provision of
care services: if yes, describeN/AProvision of
mediators (e.g., linguistic, cultural):
if yes, describe/specify
 Mediators are the not-for-profit migrant and specialized
womens orgs.
women organisations
Frequency of activities within the best practice: How often and for how long did participants involve in best practice (e.g., in general friendly towards employed people or people with care responsibilities)?Each training program, e.g. health care, public administration and environmental, etc. varied.


Target

groups

Groups

External inclusion referring to who is invited or allowed to take part from the invitation = ideal situationPeople with a migrant background professional qualifications from abroad.
Internal
inclusion referring to the participation of all participants within = real situationN/AInternal
exclusion referring to certain participants who are overly dominantEvaluation is not completed to respond.
Vulnerable groups were specified in the designed plan of the best practice:
Yes / NoIf yes: Special attention towards young people, women, elderly people: Yes / No
Yes, since all migrant groups face barriers entering a qualification adequate profession.
If yes: Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify
Special attention groups:Special attention is given to migrant women in two cases, otherwise independent of gender.
If yes, specify
Did vulnerable groups participate in the best practice:
Yes / No
By definition migrant groups are vulnerable with respect to barriers experienced within labour market integration
If yes: Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify
If yes:
Participation of young people, women, elderly people:
Yes / No
Two projects are specifically for women.
If yes, specify
If yes:
Did special training and empowerment activities support these groups within the participatory process?Yes


Public Information

Activities on the Best Practice

Activities 

Means of Information provided

Information documents (e.g., flyer, brochures, invitation letters):
Yes / No
Yes
If yes: multiple
Multiple languages available:
Yes /
No
If yes: non
Non-technical language used:
Yes / No
Yes
Social Media
(e.g., facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, websites, blog): Yes / NoIf yes: please specifyOthers (1-2 sentences)
:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IQRINBerlin

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rin-berlin/


Way of Communication

Way of CommunicationMultiple
Website and social media postings:
Yes / No
Yes
Information documents distributed in the post box:
Yes /
No
Information documents distributed on streets and public spaces (during events):
Yes /
No
Press releases in “traditional” public media (e.g. linear TV, daily newspapers etc.):
Yes /
No
Special-target activities (e.g. through gate-openers, community workers etc.):
yes/no
Yes


Monitoring

Monitoring process on the best practice available?
Yes / No
Available to Network members 
If yes: Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to the participants:
Yes / NoIf yes: How? How often?
No. To be further examined
Integration

Is there an integration of participants in the monitoring process?

Yes / No

Own evaluation
If yes:
Did they have the opportunity to suggest changes to the process?
Yes / No
Feedback process
Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to network partners (public and non-public actors)?To be further examined
If yes: How? How often?


Impact Assessment and/or Evaluation

Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process?Focus groups are applied for
intergroup
inter-group feedback 


Citizen Empowerment & Representation

Structured Decision-Making

Explanation of objectives and methods, at the beginning of the process?
Yes / No
Yes
Do the participants make final decisions?No. Because it is a training program to supplement needs 
If no:
Why not? Who decides instead?
Reauirements
Requirements for occupational preparation
If yes: What kinds of decisions?
If yes:
Is there a veto right by the citizens (i.e. if they are against a specific option this is not implemented?)?
Yes / No
No does not apply
At the end of the participation process: Final document on the decisions that were taken?
Yes / NoUnknown…still
Unknown. Still in process
If yes:
Is there a publication of this document available?
Yes / No
Not at this time
If yes:
Is the publication of this document sent to participants and/or affected community?
Yes / No
Feedback process to training
orgs& migr. Orgs
organisations and migrant organisations in Network


Tools to Enhance Citizens’ Empowerment

Clear definition and communication of mutual commitments, decision-making roles and any limits on the decisions?
Yes / No
Unknown,
potentiall
potentially yes, process continues
Are specific tools available to participants (e.g., regular meetings or
trainings
training, apps)?N/A
If yes: What kind of?
If not: Why not?
Integration of empowerment tools in multi-level-governance-system?N/A
If yes: Where [in the sense of at which level in the multilevel-governance (vertical)]?If yes: For whom in particular (horizontal)?If not: Why not? What results from that (e.g., disconnection etc.)
Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups
Which groups are involved at which stage of the participatory process?Migrant and
womens organiziations
women organizations. Belonging to network.
What are the tasks of the groups? Describe for each group.N/A