Versionen im Vergleich

Alte Version 14

changes.mady.by.user Boczy Tatjana

Gespeichert am

verglichen mit

Neue Version Aktuell

changes.mady.by.user Boczy Tatjana

Gespeichert am

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

The Communities' ParcOfficina project involves a participatory initiative focused on the development of the green area known as Parco del Naviglio, situated in the neighborhood of San Leonardo , between Via Paradigna and Strada Naviglio Alto.

The Municipality of Parma and the association IBO Italia ODV-ETS have committed to co-designing and implementing the Communities' ParcOfficina project. Its primary goal is the structural revitalization of Parco del Naviglio, intending to return to the community a green space for communal use. The larger ambition is to create a multifunctional area meant to be inhabited and enjoyed throughout the day. This vision includes identifying potential personal services, sports, recreational activities, and socio-cultural programs in addition to the existing offerings.

The project Communities' ParcOfficina was submitted by the Municipality of Parma for the "2020 Call for Grants to Support Participation Processes" and received funding from the Emilia-Romagna Region.

©tbc ©Municipality of Parma



Involved Actors & Resources

Governmental body:
Yes / No
YesIf yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the governmental body
Municipality of Parma through Association IBO Italia
Other public actors:
Yes / No
YesIf yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the public actors and describe which sector and explain their role, briefly
  • Education > Public primary and secondary schools: Istituto Comprensivo Micheli and
  • Istituto Comprensivo Toscanini. Role: they took part to the participatory process
Private for-profit actors:
Yes / NoYesIf yes, explain by using types of private for-profit actors such as public engagement consultants, companies etc.
Company: Chiesi SPA (pharmaceutical sector) > located in the
neighboordhood
neighborhood of the project
Private not-for-profit actors:
Yes / No
YesIf yes, explain by using types of private not-for-profit actors such as associations, informal networks etc.
  • Associations
  • Informal group of citizens
  • Foundation and cooperatives
    • Consiglio dei Cittadini Volontari di San Leonardo
    • Consiglio dei Cittadini Volontari di Cortile San Martino
    • Associazione Amici della Biblioteca di San Leonardo
    • Gruppo Scuola Coop. Soc.
    • Associazione Medaglie d’Oro Bormioli
    • Fondazione Teatrale Lenz
Civic actors:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes, explain
Explain on the heterogeneity of the participants with respect to gender, age, educational qualification, place of residence etc.No info about that 
Other actors:
Yes / No
No
If yes, explain
Funding/Financial resources for the particular best practice example:Yes
If yes, specify e.g.
Specification (amount of funding/year)€ 15.000 - 2020
and the source(s) of funding (if more sources, please specify)Regione Emilia-Romagna - Bando Partecipazione 2020


Type of Governance

Participatory process: Yes / NoYesDeliberative process: Yes / NoNoOther forms: if yes, specify;NoTop-downXBottom-upNoOthers: if yes, specify;
Top-Down participatory process


Specific Features on Practical Arrangements to Promote Inclusiveness

Cost reimbursement (e.g., for public transport, compensation of working hours)
: If yes, describe
No
Provision of care services
: If yes, describe
No
Provision of mediators (e.g., linguistic, cultural)
: If yes, describe/specify
Yes
>
, surveys distributed in the schools and during events in the park have been translated in two languages
Frequency of activities within the best practice:
How often and for how long did participants involve in best practice
(e.g., in general friendly towards employed people or people with care responsibilities)?

Participants met

7

seven times, late afternoon for about

2 hours + 5 events

two hours and five events in the park 


Target Groups

External inclusion referring to who is invited or allowed to take part from the invitation
=

(in an ideal situation)		Target group: all individuals interested in giving a new
live
life to the park
Internal inclusion referring to the participation of all participants within
=
, i.e. the real situationNegotiation table made up by actors indicated above,  but during the process citizens joined the table
Internal exclusion referring to certain participants who are overly dominantAssociation "Amici della biblioteca di san leonardo" composed mainly by retired citizens
reteired
with high level of education. This association is very active in the neighborhood.
Vulnerable groups were specified in the designed plan of the best practice:
Yes / No
Yes, included among other categories
If yes:
Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.?
Specify.
Elderly people; disabled, women; migrants
If yes:
Special attention towards
young people, women, elderly people
:
Yes / NoYes
If yes, specify.
Young people, since close to the park there's a youth center
Did vulnerable groups participate in the best practice:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes: Who in particular
,
e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify.
Elderly people; young people; citizens with migrant background
If yes:
Participation of young people, women, elderly people:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes
,
specify.
Women; elderly people
If yes:

Did special training and empowerment activities support these groups within the participatory process?

Yes
>
, the process was guided by a facilitator


Public Information Activities

Means of Information provided

Information documents (e.g., flyer, brochures, invitation letters):
Yes / No
Yes
If yes: multiple
Multiple languages available:
Yes / No
No
If yes: non
Non-technical language used:
Yes / No
Yes
Social Media
(e.g., facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, websites, blog): Yes / NoYesIf yes
:
please specify
Facebook
Others (1-2 sentences)
No


Ways of Communication 

Website and social media postings:
Yes / No
Yes
Information documents distributed in the post box:
Yes / No
No
Information documents distributed on streets and public spaces (during events):
Yes / No
No
Press releases in “traditional” public media (e.g. linear TV, daily newspapers etc.):
Yes / No
Yes
Special-target activities (e.g. through gate-openers, community workers etc.):
Yes / No
No


Monitoring

Monitoring process on the best practice available?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Continuous information on monitoring results provided to the participants:
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
How? How often?Participants continue to meet
in order of following the implemnetation
to follow the implementation of what
decided
was agreed
Integration of participants in the monitoring process?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Did they have the opportunity to suggest changes to the process?
Yes / No
Yes
Continuous
Is there continuous information on monitoring results provided to network partners
(public and non-public actors)
?Yes
If yes:
How? How often?Depending on needs


Impact Assessment and/or Evaluation

Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place:
Yes / No
No because the the work is not finished yet
If yes: Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process?


Citizen Empowerment & Representation

Structured Decision-Making

Explanation of objectives and methods, at the beginning of the process?
Yes / No
Yes
Do the participants make final decisions?Yes
If no: Why? Who decides instead?
If yes:
What kinds of decisions?The decision is related to the use of the money for improving the park and for responding to citizens' needs and desires
If yes:
Is there a veto right by the citizens (i.e. if they are against a specific option this is not implemented?)?
Yes / No
No
At the end of the participation process: Final document on the decisions that were taken?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Is the publication of this document available?
Yes / No
Yes
If yes:
Was the publication of this document sent to participants and/or affected community?
Yes / No
Yes


Tools to Enhance Citizens’ Empowerment

Clear definition and communication of mutual commitments, decision-making roles and any limits on the decisions?
Yes / No
Yes
. The
, the only limit to the process was given by the budget
Are specific tools available to participants (e.g., regular meetings or
trainings
training, apps)?Yes
If yes: What kind of?Regular
, regular meetings during the process
If not: Why not?


Integration of empowerment tools in multi-level-governance-system

Where are these tools available?
YesIf yes: Where [in
[In the sense of at which level in the multilevel-governance (vertical).]
?
Involvement of policy
makers  > they
makers. They learned from this experience an approach that can be reproduced.
If yes:
For whom are they useful in particular (horizontal)?For
citiziens
citizens living in other
neighbourhood s
neighborhoods of the city
If not: Why not? What results from that (e.g., disconnection etc.)


Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups

Which groups are involved at which stage of the participatory process?All groups described above
What are the tasks of the groups? Describe for each group.Each group took part at the discussions and decisions
Which groups are underrepresented among the participants?
Why?
 Refugees