...
...
...
Involved Actors & Resources
| Governmental body: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No | Yes |
...
| If yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the governmental body |
...
| Ministry of Culture, Republic of Slovenia Housing Fund | |
| Other public actors: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No | Yes |
...
| If yes, explain by filling in the name(s) of the public actors and describe which sector and explain their role, briefly |
...
| Municipality of Ljubljana, Public Housing Fund of the Municipality of Ljubljana | |
| Private for-profit actors: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| No |
...
| If yes, explain by using types of private for-profit actors such as public engagement consultants, companies etc. |
...
| Private not-for-profit actors: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No | No |
...
| If yes, explain by using types of private not-for-profit actors such as associations, informal networks etc. |
...
| Civic actors: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
...
| If yes, explain on the heterogeneity of the participants with respect to gender, age, educational qualification, place of residence etc. | Students, Young employed profesionals, Ljubljana |
| Other actors: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| If yes, explain | |
| Funding/Financial resources for the particular best practice example: | National and EU Projects |
...
| If yes, specify e.g. amount of funding/year | / |
| and the source(s) of funding (if more sources, please specify) | ACF 2014 - 2021, ESRR, Ministry of Public Administration |
Type of Governance
| Participatory process: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Deliberative process: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes | |
| Other forms: if yes, specify; | |
| Top-down |
...
| No |
| Bottom-up |
...
| Yes |
| Others: if yes, specify; |
...
Specifal Features of the Best Practice which explain Practical Arrangements to Promote Inclusiveness
| Cost reimbursement (e.g., for public transport, compensation of working hours): if yes, describe | No |
| Provision of care services: if yes, describe |
...
| No |
| Provision of mediators (e.g., linguistic, cultural): if yes, describe/specify |
...
| No | |
| Frequency of activities within the best practice: How often and for how long did participants involve in best practice (e.g., in general friendly towards employed people or people with care responsibilities)? | 2023: From 14 days to |
...
| monthly. Depends on activities. |
Target groups
| External inclusion referring to who is invited or allowed to take part from the invitation = ideal situation | Inhabitants of Ljubljana, especially tennnents, young profesionals, open to all. |
| Internal inclusion referring to the participation of all participants within = real |
...
| situation | |
| Internal exclusion referring to certain participants who are overly |
...
| dominant | |
| Vulnerable groups were specified in the designed plan of the best practice: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify. |
...
| Precarious work situation, Young families, migrants, poor. |
| If yes: Special attention towards young people, women, elderly people: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes, specify. |
...
| People with limited posibilities to find affordable accomodation in Ljubljana |
| Did vulnerable groups participate in the best practice: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: Who in particular, e.g. migrants, people in precarious work-situation etc.? Specify. |
...
| Migrants, young professionals, tennets |
| If yes: Participation of young people, women, elderly people: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes, specify. |
...
| Young people, women, migrants |
| If yes: Did special training and empowerment activities support these groups within the participatory process? |
...
| No |
Public Information Activities on the Best Practice
| Means of Information Provided | Multiple |
| Information documents (e.g., flyer, brochures, invitation letters): yes/no; |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: multiple languages available: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| No |
| If yes: non-technical language used: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Social Media (e.g., facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, websites, blog): |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: |
...
| Please specify | Facebook, Instagram |
| Others (1-2 sentences) |
| Way of Communication | |
| Website and social media postings: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes | |
| Information documents distributed in the post box: yes/no | Yes |
| Information documents distributed on streets and public spaces (during events): |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Press releases in “traditional” public media (e.g. linear TV, daily newspapers etc.): |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| No |
| Special-target activities (e.g. through gate-openers, community workers etc.): |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Monitoring | |
| Monitoring process on the best practice available? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: Continuous information on monitoring results provided to the participants: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: How? How often? |
...
| Yearly |
| Integration of participants in the monitoring process? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: Did they have the opportunity to suggest changes to the process? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Continuous information on monitoring results provided to network partners (public and non-public actors)? |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: How? How often? |
...
| Once every 6 months |
Impact Assessment/Evaluation
| Did an impact assessment (e.g., achievements, challenges) or evaluation (standardized success measurement) take place: |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No | Yes |
| If yes: Who evaluates? What? How? At which point of process? | Internal evaluation |
Citizen Empowerment & Representation
| Structured Decision-Making | |
| Explanation of objectives and methods, at the beginning of the process? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| Do the participants make final decisions? |
...
| Yes | |
| If no: Why? Who decides instead? | |
| If yes: What kinds of decisions? | Selected ones. |
| If yes: Is there a veto right by the citizens (i.e. if they are against a specific option this is not implemented?)? |
...
| Yes / |
...
| No | Its an assembly. No veto |
| At the end of the participation process: Final document on the decisions that were taken? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: publication of this document available? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: publication of this document sent to participants and/or affected community? Yes / |
...
| No |
...
| Yes | |
| Tools to Enhance Citizens’ Empowerment | |
| Clear definition and communication of mutual commitments, decision-making roles and any limits on the decisions? Yes / No |
...
| Yes |
| Are specific tools available to participants (e.g., regular meetings or trainings, apps)? |
...
| Yes | |
| If yes: What kind of? | Meetings, asembleys |
| If not: Why not? | |
| Integration of empowerment tools in multi-level-governance-system? |
...
| Yes |
| If yes: Where [in the sense of at which level in the multilevel-governance (vertical)]? |
...
| National, local level |
| If yes: For whom in particular (horizontal)? |
...
| Students, young |
...
| professionals, tennets, inhabitants | |
| If not: Why not? What results from that (e.g., disconnection etc.) | |
| Involvement and Tasks of Participating Groups |
...
| Horizontal non-hierarhical |
| Which groups are involved at which stage of the participatory process? |
...
| Architects, urbanists, students, young profesionals | |
| What are the tasks of the groups? Describe for each group. | Planning, researching, informing, lobiing, |
| Which groups are underrepresented among the participants? Why? |